Starting tomorrow, Tuesday, Constitutional Court A session to make oral comments, in a controversial case related to a dispute between a citizen and the Bar Association.
Phases are centered The case About the citizen’s claim that the law Which requires appointing a lawyer before the bodies of appeal and cassation is “unconstitutional.”
The background of the case goes back to a citizen from the state of Djelfa raising a case before him supreme courtregarding what he considers to be the unconstitutionality of the articles obligating him to appoint a lawyer, and he violated a decision from the Supreme Court, referring his defenses to the Constitutional Court, while postponing the decision on his original case until his request is decided before the constitutional judiciary.
The citizen based his claim on the issue of “the necessity of representing opponents by a lawyer before the bodies of appeal and cassation,” BConstitution The same, and some international, continental and regional instruments, are unnecessary.
The citizen also sought help from a previous decision by the Constitutional Court, which ruled that Articles 815, 826, 904, 905, and 906 of the Civil and Administrative Procedure Code were unconstitutional.
It is noteworthy that the case raised a wide legal controversy among Lawyers’ Association On the one hand, and the citizen on the other.
#citizen #challenges #lawyers #Algeria
oussama_boulegheb